Design & parts
Function, geometry, part count and tolerance demands.
Reduce the cost of the product system, not just the quoted unit price.
For teams whose existing product costs too much to manufacture. Review design, materials, components, processes, assembly and supply-chain choices together.
A proposed saving remains an estimate until the revised product and production route are validated. No percentage reduction is promised before the product and baseline are reviewed.
Function, geometry, part count and tolerance demands.
Required properties, specification and processing.
Process choice, tooling and production volume.
Access, sequence, testing, rework and yield loss.
Order assumptions, components and logistics.
A comparison framework, not an estimate of savings for your product.
Separate material, bought-in parts, processing, tooling allocation, assembly, test, yield loss and logistics where information is available. Record the quantity and assumptions behind every comparison.
Look for tolerance requirements that exceed functional need, unnecessary parts, difficult assembly, over-specified materials or finishes, and unsuitable production routes. Review supply-chain choices alongside engineering rather than treating price negotiation as the whole solution.
Estimate recurring savings, one-time engineering and tooling costs, minimum order quantities, lead-time implications and verification effort. Check whether a nominal saving transfers cost or risk into inspection, scrap, inventory or service.
Prioritize opportunities by impact, confidence and implementation burden. Use samples or trials to verify retained performance and quality. Release approved changes through the BOM, drawings and supplier instructions, then compare actual production cost with the baseline.
Tell us about your product, the work already done and the problem you want to solve. You do not need to know which service to ask for.
Discuss your project